MORE: Carlisle buried baby case: After Ohio Supreme Court ruling what happens next?
The question of privilege pertains to statements Richardson made to one of her doctors. Prosecutors want to use the statements as evidence, and defense attorneys want them excluded.
Richardson, now 19, is charged with aggravated murder, involuntary manslaughter, gross abuse of a corpse, tampering with evidence and child endangering in the death of her infant daughter. She is free on bond.
The Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal in February, and the defense team filed a motion asking the state’s highest court to reconsider that decision. Today, the request for consideration was denied.
MORE: Ohio Supreme Court declines to hear Carlisle buried baby case
A tentative trial date of Sept. 3 was set in December in Warren County Common Pleas Court.
“We are ready for trial on Sept. 3,” defense attorney Rittgers said this morning. He added there are no plans for Richardson to plead to the charges or take a plea deal.
A status conference in the case has been set Tuesday before Judge Donald Oda II.
Warren County Prosecutor David Fornshell said the state is also ready to litigate.
“We are ready for trial. We have been read since before the first appeal was filed,” he said today.
The appeals court ruled that physician-patient privilege doesn’t apply in the case and that the teen’s conversations with two doctors should be admitted as evidence in her upcoming trial.
MORE: Appeals court side with prosecution in Carlisle buried baby case
Documents requesting the Ohio Supreme Court take the case were filed under seal, with the defense stating, “The physician-patient privilege statute exists for a specific purpose to create an atmosphere of confidentiality and to encourage patients to make a full disclosure of their conditions to their physicians without fear that those details will later become public.”
Both the defense and prosecution had appealed a split decision handed down by Warren County Common Pleas Judge Donald Oda II, just days before the trial was scheduled to begin last spring.
Oda ruled that doctor-patient privilege did not apply to anything Richardson said about burying the infant’s remains. However, Oda ruled that another conversation Richardson had with a different doctor was privileged.
Richardson’s defense team argued that all of the teen’s conversations with her doctors about her pregnancy or what may have happened afterward were protected by doctor-patient privilege.
Warren County prosecutors, however, said a conversation Richardson had with one of her doctors — that she buried the remains in the backyard, which prompted the physician to call police — is not privileged because of a doctor’s duty to report abuse, neglect or other harm to a child.
“Physician-patient privilege was waived due to application of … a statute that places a duty on persons with special relationships to minors to report suspected or known abuse or neglect, where there is reasonable cause to suspect based on facts that would cause a reasonable person in similar circumstances to suspect, that a child suffered a physical wound,” a summary of the 12th District decision states.
MORE: Brooke Richardson off house arrest, but judge imposes other restrictions
About the Author
