Trump says U.S. will win in Afghanistan but offers few details

‘We will not talk about numbers of troops,’ he says.
Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford speaks to members of his staff aboard his plane as it departs Fort Greely, Alaska, Saturday, Aug. 19, 2017, to travel to Andrews Air Force Base, Md. President Donald Trump is “studying and considering his options” for a new approach to Afghanistan and the broader South Asia region, the White House said Friday. Gen. Joseph Votel, the Central Command chief who is responsible for U.S. military operations in the greater Middle East, including Afghanistan said that Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and Dunford represent him in the White House-led Afghanistan strategy review. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford speaks to members of his staff aboard his plane as it departs Fort Greely, Alaska, Saturday, Aug. 19, 2017, to travel to Andrews Air Force Base, Md. President Donald Trump is “studying and considering his options” for a new approach to Afghanistan and the broader South Asia region, the White House said Friday. Gen. Joseph Votel, the Central Command chief who is responsible for U.S. military operations in the greater Middle East, including Afghanistan said that Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and Dunford represent him in the White House-led Afghanistan strategy review. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

Faced with the stark possibility that the U.S. backed Afghanistan regime could fail, President Donald Trump unveiled Monday what he described as a new approach to halt “the re-emergence of safe-havens that enable terrorists to threaten America.”

In a major reversal of his longstanding doubts about U.S. involvement in the 16-year conflict of Afghanistan, Trump said “from now on, victory” in Afghanistan “will have a clear definition,” which includes crushing Islamic State militants and al Qaeda terrorists in that war-torn country and “stopping mass terror attacks against Americans before they emerge.”

“Our nation must seek an honorable and enduring outcome worthy of the tremendous sacrifices that have been made,” Trump said in a nationally televised address in prime time on the East Coast.

Although the language of Trump’s speech was bold and decisive, Trump was vague about many of the details. Although officials are expecting Trump will send an additional 4,000 troops to reinforce the 8,400 Americans in Afghanistan, he declared that he has “said many times how counterproductive it is for the United States to announce in advance the dates we intend to begin, or end, military operations.”

“We will not talk about numbers of troops or our plans for further military activities,” Trump said. He spoke before a largely military audience at the military base at Fort Myer across the Potomac River from Washington. Among those gathered to listen to Trump’s speech were Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Vice President Mike Pence, First Lady Melania Trump, and White House National Security H.R. McMaster.

RELATED: Trump hedges as military pitches more aggressive strategy

In a nod to his past calls to end U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan, Trump said his “original instinct was to pull out, and historically I like following my instincts. But all of my life I’ve heard that decisions are much different when you sit behind the desk in the Oval Office, in other words when you are president of the United States.

After a lengthy review with his top military advisers, Trump said he concluded “the consequences of a rapid exit are both predictable and unacceptable.”

RELATED: Trump studying options for new approach to Afghan war

Pointing to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in suburban Washington, Trump warned “a hasty withdrawal would create a vacuum that terrorists — including ISIS and al Qaeda — would instantly fill, just as happened before” the 2001 attacks.

“I concluded that the security threats we face in Afghanistan and the broader region are immense,” Trump said.

As part of what he described as a new strategy, Trump also said the United States will intensify pressure on Pakistan, whose intelligence services have been accused of supporting terrorist organizations that have launched attacks in Afghanistan.

“We can no longer be silent about Pakistan’s safe havens for terrorist organizations, the Taliban, and other groups that pose a threat to the region and beyond. Pakistan has much to gain from partnering with our effort in Afghanistan,” Trump said. “It has much to lose by continuing to harbor terrorists.”

He also raised the specter that nuclear weapons from Pakistan or India’s arsenal could fall into the hands of terrorists, saying “we must prevent nuclear weapons and materials from coming into the hands of terrorists and being used against us or anywhere in the world for that matter.”

Trump’s decision is controversial as many Americans are weary of the prolonged conflict, in which more than 2,300 American soldiers have been killed in action. The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction this summer reported the U.S. has spent $714 billion for both combat operations and reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan.

The same report showed that nearly 60 percent of the districts in Afghanistan are under government control. But the Afghan Army has been unable to seize the nearly 40 percent of the land controlled by the Taliban, which has sponsored a bloody insurgency against the government.

Ohio Gov. John Kasich said that “16 years and the lives of over 2,000 American heroes are more than enough of a price to have paid to eradicate a terrorist sanctuary. America cannot afford to make an open-ended commitment of further lives and treasure to the improbable proposition of building a cohesive nation in Afghanistan,” the Republican governor said in a statement.

Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, said the speech “is a reversal from the president’s years of criticizing this war — both as a private citizen and a candidate. Tonight’s address left us with nothing more than unanswered questions.”

But Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, countered by saying, “We cannot allow Afghanistan to be used again as a safe haven from which al Qaeda, ISIS, and our terrorist enemies can launch attacks on the U.S. and our allies. To do that we need stable partners in the Afghan government.”

About the Author